李佳, 程强, 王孝坤, 胡海翔, 李龙响, 李洪士, 薛栋林, 张学军. 计算全息检测技术的精度溯源研究现状分析(内封面文章)[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2024, 53(8): 20240135. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20240135
引用本文: 李佳, 程强, 王孝坤, 胡海翔, 李龙响, 李洪士, 薛栋林, 张学军. 计算全息检测技术的精度溯源研究现状分析(内封面文章)[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2024, 53(8): 20240135. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20240135
LI Jia, CHENG Qiang, WANG Xiaokun, HU Haixiang, LI Longxiang, LI Hongshi, XUE Donglin, ZHANG Xuejun. Analysis of the current status of research on accuracy traceability based on computational holographic detection technology(inner cover paper)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(8): 20240135. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20240135
Citation: LI Jia, CHENG Qiang, WANG Xiaokun, HU Haixiang, LI Longxiang, LI Hongshi, XUE Donglin, ZHANG Xuejun. Analysis of the current status of research on accuracy traceability based on computational holographic detection technology(inner cover paper)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(8): 20240135. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20240135

计算全息检测技术的精度溯源研究现状分析(内封面文章)

Analysis of the current status of research on accuracy traceability based on computational holographic detection technology(inner cover paper)

  • 摘要: 随着光学系统性能的要求越来越高,非球面、自由曲面等复杂光学曲面能够提升系统的成像性能,因此提升复杂光学曲面的检测精度极为重要。干涉检测是测量复杂光学曲面的重要手段,其中计算全息检测法(Computer Generated Hologram,CGH)作为干涉检测中的一种,因其精度高和设计自由度大等优点得到了广泛的应用。但是在CGH检测复杂曲面的过程中存在的各类误差会影响波前检测的精度。文中首先介绍了计算全息法的检测精度现状,其次归纳总结了造成计算全息法误差的主要因素。分别介绍了不同误差的产生原理、影响效果、相对应标定补偿方法及适用情景和优缺点;并介绍了基于CGH占空比与线条位置误差的调研现状分析以及现有的研究方法;最后对计算全息法检测的精度溯源和精度提升研究趋势进行了展望。

     

    Abstract:
    Significance  As the performance of optical systems is becoming more and more demanding, complex optical surfaces such as aspheres and free-form surfaces can improve the imaging performance of the system, so it is extremely important to improve the detection accuracy of complex optical surfaces. Interference detection is an important means of measuring complex optical surfaces, and Computer Generated Holograms (CGH), as one of the interferometric detection methods, has been widely used due to its high accuracy and large degree of design freedom. However, the various types of errors existing in the process of CGH detection of complex surfaces will affect the accuracy of wavefront detection. The significance of Computer-Generated Holograms (CGH) in optical surface metrology lies in its transformative potential to achieve unparalleled precision and efficiency in measuring complex surface profiles. Traditional metrology methods often face limitations in accuracy and versatility, particularly when dealing with intricate geometries and microscopic features. In contrast, CGH offers a non-contact, high-resolution approach that promises to revolutionize metrology across various industries, including semiconductor manufacturing, aerospace engineering, and biomedical sciences.
    Progress  In the development of Computer Generated Holograms (CGH) technology, the study and management of errors play a crucial role. CGH technology is capable of high-precision surface measurements and morphology reconstruction by utilising the principles of computational optics. However, how to effectively identify, understand and minimise errors is crucial to ensure measurement accuracy. In recent years, researchers have focused on addressing the various sources of error that can exist in CGH systems, which include, but are not limited to, non-uniformities in the optical system, environmental factors (e.g., vibration and temperature variations), and the accuracy of the algorithms themselves. Through systematic error analyses and corrections (Fig.2), researchers have continued to improve the algorithms and hardware designs in order to enhance the stability and measurement accuracy of the CGH system. Specifically, research advances have shown that novel error compensation techniques and advanced data processing algorithms have significantly improved the CGH system's ability to measure complex surfaces. These techniques, including model-based correction methods and real-time feedback control systems, can effectively reduce system errors and improve measurement accuracy and repeatability. Future research directions will further focus on improving the ability of CGH systems to measure surfaces at tiny scales and under non-ideal conditions, such as applications in high or very low temperature environments. In addition, with the advancement of computing power and optical technology, more adaptive error correction methods based on machine learning and artificial intelligence are expected to emerge, which will open up new possibilities for the wide application of CGH technology in industrial production and scientific research.
    Conclusions The results presents findings related to each category of CGH errors identified in the study. It discusses the specific mechanisms contributing to design, encoding, and manufacturing errors, supported by relevant literature and experimental data. The section also includes case studies and comparative analyses of calibration methods used to mitigate these errors in practical applications. Discussions expand on the implications of error reduction strategies for improving the accuracy of CGH-based interferometric measurements in various optical testing scenarios. Furthermore, the section examines the limitations of current methodologies and proposes potential avenues for future research aimed at advancing CGH technology in optical surface metrology. In conclusion, the study synthesizes the key findings regarding CGH errors and their impact on measurement accuracy in optical surface metrology. It summarizes the significance of addressing design, encoding, and manufacturing errors to enhance the performance of CGH-based interferometric systems. The conclusions highlight the effectiveness of calibration techniques in minimizing error propagation and improving measurement reliability. Additionally, the section outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for continued innovation in CGH technology to meet evolving demands in high-precision optical manufacturing and metrology.

     

/

返回文章
返回