物理诊断设备精确自<em>φ</em>直方法

王维; 何俊华; 张敏; 韦明志; 闫亚东; 杨正华; 杨品

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

物理诊断设备精确自φ直方法

王维, 何俊华, 张敏, 韦明志, 闫亚东, 杨正华, 杨品

文章导航 > 红外与激光工程 > 2015 > 44(3): 901-905

王维, 何俊华, 张敏, 韦明志, 闫亚东, 杨正华, 杨品. 物理诊断设备精确自φ直方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(3): 901-905.

引用本文:

王维, 何俊华, 张敏, 韦明志, 闫亚东, 杨正华, 杨品. 物理诊断设备精确自φ直方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(3): 901-905.

Wang Wei, He Junhua, Zhang Min, Wei Mingzhi, Yan Yadong, Yang Zhenghua, Yang Pin. Automatic alignment method for diagnostic instrument[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(3): 901-905.

Citation:

Wang Wei, He Junhua, Zhang Min, Wei Mingzhi, Yan Yadong, Yang Zhenghua, Yang Pin. Automatic alignment method for diagnostic instrument[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(3): 901-905.

物理诊断设备精确自φ直方法

1.
中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所,陕西西安7100071;
2.
中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心,四川绵阳621900

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(40805013)

详细信息

作者简介:
王维(1980-),男,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事机器视觉与运动控制方面的研究.Email:wangweii@opt.qc.cn

中图分类号: TP271⁺.5

Automatic alignment method for diagnostic instrument

1.
Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi'an 710071,China;
2.
Research Center of Laser Fusion,CAEP,Mianyang 621900,China

摘要: 为了获确的激光打靶实验数据,需要使用诊断搭载平台搭载物理诊断设备对打靶目标进行高精直.针对传统方法存在耗时、误差(RMS)较大的问题,根据搭载平台与物理诊断设备的特点,提出了一种基于视觉伺服的精确自直方法.首先,构建三直向量估算立体视觉系统中靶的偏差,在弱透视条件下,估算值接近于真值;然后,建立三自由度姿态调节模型,提高姿态调节精度.最后,运直向量与调节模型设计视觉伺服控制器,仅需一次离线标定即可进行快直.通过以上改进,实现了物理诊断设备的精确自直.实验结果表明,诊断设备直精度(RMS)分别为:x 指向为11m,y 指向为12m.搭载分幅相机进行激光打靶考核验证,得到了物理实验过程的X光焦斑图像,表直方法满足工程使用要求.
- 自Φ直Φ直向量 /
- 调节模型 /
- 搭载平台 /
- 视觉伺服
Abstract: In order to capture accurate data of lase-driven fusion test, diagnostic instruments (DI) which are mounted onto diagnostic instrument manipulator (DIM) should align the target with tight tolerance. Traditional alignment methods have problems of time consumption and error large. An accurate automatic alignment method was introduced, which based on visual servoing according to the virtue of DIM and DI. First, a 3D alignment vector was constructed to estimate the target deviation in the stereo vision system. Under narrow field of view, estimated value was close to true deviation. Second, a 3 DOF pose adjusting mode was founded to promote motion accuracy. Finally, a visual servo controller based on the alignment vector and pose adjustment mode was designed. The process of alignment needs offline calibration only once. Through the three steps, DI can automatic align the target with high accuracy. Test indicates that alignment accuracy (RMS) is 11m in x direction and 12m in y direction. Laser shot test with X-ray framing camera show that the automatic align method can satisfy the project requirements.
- automatic alignment /
- alignment vector /
- adjusting model /
- DIM

[1]
[2]	Kalantar D H, Nicola P Di, Shingleton N, et al. An overview of target and diagnostic alignment at the National Ignition Facility [C]//SPIE, 2012, 8505: 850509.
[3]	Nicola P Di, Kalantar D, Mccarville T, et al. Beam and target alignment at the National Ignition Facility using the Target Alignment Sensor(TAS)[C]//SPIE, 2012, 8505: 85050B.
[4]
[5]	Shingleton N, Kalantar D, Wood R, et al. Alignment of an x-ray imager line of sight in the National Ignition Facility(NIF) target chamber using a Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator(DIM) and Opposed Port Alignment System(OPAS)[C]//SPIE, 2012, 8505: 85050A.
[6]
[7]
[8]	Hibbard W J, Landon M D, Vergino M D, et al. Design of the national ignition facility diagnostic instrument manipulator[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2001, 72(1): 530-532.
[9]	Robert Plummer. Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator(DIM) upgrades for reliability and operational efficiency in a radiological contamination environment at the National Ignition Facility(NIF)[C]//SPIE, 2012, 8850: 885005.
[10]
[11]	Chaumette F, Hutchinson S. Visual servo control-partII:advanced approach[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2007, 14(1): 109-118.
[12]
[13]
[14]	Pomares J, Perea I, Jara C A, et al. Dynamic visual servo control of a 4-axis joint tool to track image trajectories during machining complex shapes[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(4): 261-270.
[15]	Kim G W. Uncalibrated visual servoing through the efficient estimation of the image jacobian for large residual[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering Technology, 2013, 8(2): 385-392.

[1]	张越杰, 张鹏, 冉承平, 张新勇. 扰动分离自抗扰控制在光电稳定平台上的应用 . 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(10): 20210068-1-20210068-9. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20210068
[2]	徐进, 杨世海, 叶宇, 顾伯忠. 极端环境下光学红外望远镜伺服系统模型预测 . 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(12): 20210209-1-20210209-8. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20210209
[3]	王春阳, 赵尚起, 史红伟, 刘雪莲. 机载光电稳瞄平台的线性自抗扰控制 . 红外与激光工程, 2019, 48(12): 1213002-1213002(7). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201948.1213002
[4]	黄富瑜, 郑喆, 李佩军, 谢大兵, 黄欣鑫. 非相似立体视觉模型构建与验证 . 红外与激光工程, 2019, 48(8): 825003-0825003(7). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201948.0825003
[5]	方宇超, 李梦雪, 车英. 基于自抗扰控制的光电平台视轴稳定技术研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2018, 47(3): 317005-0317005(9). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.0317005
[6]	张伟, 杨立保, 李清雅, 王严, 王晶. 直圆抛物线复合铰链柔度研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2018, 47(11): 1117009-1117009(7). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1117009
[7]	李彦, 赵远, 徐小斌, 蔡伟. 光子带隙光纤准直器回波损耗研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2017, 46(9): 920002-0920002(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0920002
[8]	宋言明, 潘志康, 孟晓辰, 娄小平, 祝连庆. 基于仿人眼自适应调节的多光谱视觉图像处理方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2017, 46(9): 910001-0910001(8). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0910001
[9]	殷宗迪, 董浩, 史文杰, 张锋. 精确模型辨识的光电平台自抗扰控制器 . 红外与激光工程, 2017, 46(9): 926001-0926001(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0926001
[10]	刘石, 张国玉, 孙高飞, 高玉军, 王凌云, 王浩君. 高精度准直式太阳模拟器光机结构设计 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(4): 1229-1235.
[11]	王怡, 杜凡, 马晶, 谭立英. 空间光通信系统发射光束准直特性研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(3): 1008-1014.
[12]	邹百英, 赵慧洁, 张颖, 李建华. 离轴抛物面镜准直输出辐照度特性 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(2): 688-692.
[13]	王中任, 路清彦, 刘海生. 基于CAD模型的随机工件视觉识别和定位方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(S1): 230-235.
[14]	范新明, 曹剑中, 杨洪涛, 王华伟, 杨磊, 廖加文, 王华, 雷杨杰. 改进粒子群优化在稳定平台多空间分析模型的应用 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(8): 2395-2400.
[15]	吕勇, 冯其波, 刘立双, 耿蕊, 吴思进. 基于多准直光的六自由度测量方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(11): 3597-3602.
[16]	马艳, 肖胜炜, 张万经. 用于研制纳米长度标准的激光准直原子技术研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(9): 2929-2934.
[17]	陆乔乔, 胡姝玲, 王鑫龙, 耿伟彪, 张春熹, 牛燕雄. 大功率双包层光纤准直器的建模与仿真分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(7): 2055-2060.
[18]	李贤涛, 张葆, 孙敬辉, 毛大鹏, 柏旭光, 沈宏海. 航空光电稳定平台扰动频率自适应的自抗扰控制 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(5): 1574-1581.
[19]	林丽媛, 侯春萍, 王凯. 立体视觉舒适融合限预测模型的研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(S1): 231-237.
[20]	苏娟, 杨罗, 卢俊. 基于视觉注意模型的红外图像分级压缩方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(6): 2040-2045.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 280
HTML全文浏览量: 32
PDF下载量: 153
被引次数: 0

物理诊断设备精确自φ直方法

1. 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所,陕西西安7100071;

2. 中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心,四川绵阳621900

作者简介:
王维(1980-),男,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事机器视觉与运动控制方面的研究.Email:wangweii@opt.qc.cn

收稿日期: 2014-07-12
修回日期: 2014-08-15
刊出日期: 2015-03-25

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(40805013)

中图分类号: TP271⁺.5

关键词:

摘要: 为了获确的激光打靶实验数据,需要使用诊断搭载平台搭载物理诊断设备对打靶目标进行高精直.针对传统方法存在耗时、误差(RMS)较大的问题,根据搭载平台与物理诊断设备的特点,提出了一种基于视觉伺服的精确自直方法.首先,构建三直向量估算立体视觉系统中靶的偏差,在弱透视条件下,估算值接近于真值;然后,建立三自由度姿态调节模型,提高姿态调节精度.最后,运直向量与调节模型设计视觉伺服控制器,仅需一次离线标定即可进行快直.通过以上改进,实现了物理诊断设备的精确自直.实验结果表明,诊断设备直精度(RMS)分别为:x 指向为11m,y 指向为12m.搭载分幅相机进行激光打靶考核验证,得到了物理实验过程的X光焦斑图像,表直方法满足工程使用要求.

English Abstract

Automatic alignment method for diagnostic instrument

1. Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi'an 710071,China;

2. Research Center of Laser Fusion,CAEP,Mianyang 621900,China

Received Date: 2014-07-12
Rev Recd Date: 2014-08-15
Publish Date: 2015-03-25

Keywords:

Abstract: In order to capture accurate data of lase-driven fusion test, diagnostic instruments (DI) which are mounted onto diagnostic instrument manipulator (DIM) should align the target with tight tolerance. Traditional alignment methods have problems of time consumption and error large. An accurate automatic alignment method was introduced, which based on visual servoing according to the virtue of DIM and DI. First, a 3D alignment vector was constructed to estimate the target deviation in the stereo vision system. Under narrow field of view, estimated value was close to true deviation. Second, a 3 DOF pose adjusting mode was founded to promote motion accuracy. Finally, a visual servo controller based on the alignment vector and pose adjustment mode was designed. The process of alignment needs offline calibration only once. Through the three steps, DI can automatic align the target with high accuracy. Test indicates that alignment accuracy (RMS) is 11m in x direction and 12m in y direction. Laser shot test with X-ray framing camera show that the automatic align method can satisfy the project requirements.