Volume 42 Issue 9
Feb.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Xiu Jinli, Jin Weiqi, Liu Chongliang, Wang Xia. Three-point infrared radiometric calibration and correction method using U-shaped blackbody[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2013, 42(9): 2313-2318.
Citation: Xiu Jinli, Jin Weiqi, Liu Chongliang, Wang Xia. Three-point infrared radiometric calibration and correction method using U-shaped blackbody[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2013, 42(9): 2313-2318.

Three-point infrared radiometric calibration and correction method using U-shaped blackbody

  • Received Date: 2013-01-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-02-13
  • Publish Date: 2013-09-25
  • Infrared focal plane array(IRFPA) is an important component of the thermal imaging system. However, due to facts like technical limitations and material defects in production, the environmental influence, and too long time operation, etc., the drift of the IRFPA response during their working is unavoidable. It affects the image quality of the thermal imaging systems and has negative effects on the precision of the thermal imaging equipments. Aiming to solve the problems of traditional radiation calibration and correction methods, considering the nonlinear response of infrared detectors, and taking advantage of the infrared imaging integral platform based on U-shape blackbody, a three-point infrared calibration and correction technology was discussed. Furthermore, the previous tow-point calibration and correction method was used for comparison. The experimental results show that during the temperature range of 25-65 ℃, compared with the original calibration precision, the three-point calibration technology owns quite an effective consequence with the biggest absolute error of 0.126 6 K and average error of -0.048 8 K. However, the method proposed does not have quite abvious difference with the tow-point method, so generally the tow-point calibration and correction can adapt the normal radiometric calibration application.
  • [1] Dong Liquan, Jin Weiqi, Sui Jing. Summarize on the scene-based non-uniformity correction algorithms for IRFPA[C]//SPIE, 2005, 5881: 1-5.
    [2]
    [3] Liu Ye. Research on uncooled IRFPA thermometry system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Institute of Technology, 2003. (in Chinese) 刘晔. 非制冷红外焦平面热成像测温系统的研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2003.
    [4]
    [5]
    [6] Zhao Xiaoyi, Zhang Wei, Xie Xufen. Study of relationship between absolute calibration and relative calibration[J]. Infrared, 2010, 31(9): 23-30. (in Chinese) 赵晓熠, 张伟, 谢蓄芬. 绝对辐射定标与相对辐射定标的关系研究[J]. 红外, 2010, 31(9): 23-30.
    [7] Han Qicang, Min Xiangjun, Fu Qiaoyan. HJ-1B thermal infrared band in-flight radiometric calibration[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010, 14(6): 1212-1225. (in Chinese) 韩启仓, 闵祥军, 傅俏燕. HJ-1B热红外波段在轨绝对辐射定标[J]. 遥感学报, 2010, 14(6): 1212-1225.
    [8]
    [9]
    [10] Jin Weiqi, Liu Chongliang, Xiu Jinli. Infrared non- uniformity correction and radiometric calibration technology using U-shaped blackbody[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(2): 274-277. (in Chinese) 金伟其, 刘崇亮, 修金利. 基于U形边框黑体光阑的红外成像动态辐射定标与校正技术[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(2): 274-277.
    [11] Liu Chongliang. Study on infrared non-uniformity correction and radiometric calibration technology using U-shaped blackbody[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2011. (in Chinese) 刘崇亮. 基于边框黑体视场光阑的红外非均匀校正与辐射定标处理方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2011.
    [12]
    [13] Hou Hekun. Study on radiometric calibration of infrared staring imaging system[D]. Changchun: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics, 2004. (in Chinese) 侯和坤. 红外凝视成像系统辐射定标的研究[D]. 长春: 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所, 2004.
    [14]
    [15]
    [16] Zhou Jianxun, Wang Liping, Liu Bin. Analysis of the cause for the ununiformity of infrared image[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 1997, 26(3): 11-13. (in Chinese) 周建勋, 王利平, 刘滨. 红外图像非均匀性产生原因分析[J]. 红外与激光工程, 1997, 26(3): 11-13.
    [17]
    [18] Zhang Xiaojun, Zhao Yigong. Combined algorithm for non-uniformity correction of infrared focal plane arrays[J]. Infrared Technology, 2003, 25(6): 34-38. (in Chinese) 张小军, 赵亦工. 红外焦平面非均匀校正的综合处理算法[J]. 红外技术, 2003, 25(6): 34-38.
    [19] Tang Zunlie, Qi Lin. Correction of nonuniformity of infrared focal plane image[J]. Semiconductor Opto-electronics, 2002, 23(5): 344-346. (in Chinese) 唐遵烈, 祁琳. 焦平面红外图像的非均匀性校正技术[J]. 半导体光电, 2002, 23(5): 344-346.
    [20]
    [21] Xiong Hui, Yang Weiping, Shen Zhenkang. Study of infrared FPA nonuniformity correction[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 1998, 12: 40-43. (in Chinese) 熊辉, 杨卫平, 沈振康. 红外焦平面阵列非均匀校正算法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 1998, 12: 40-43.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(409) PDF downloads(157) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Three-point infrared radiometric calibration and correction method using U-shaped blackbody

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System,Ministry of Education of China,School of Optoelectronics,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China

Abstract: Infrared focal plane array(IRFPA) is an important component of the thermal imaging system. However, due to facts like technical limitations and material defects in production, the environmental influence, and too long time operation, etc., the drift of the IRFPA response during their working is unavoidable. It affects the image quality of the thermal imaging systems and has negative effects on the precision of the thermal imaging equipments. Aiming to solve the problems of traditional radiation calibration and correction methods, considering the nonlinear response of infrared detectors, and taking advantage of the infrared imaging integral platform based on U-shape blackbody, a three-point infrared calibration and correction technology was discussed. Furthermore, the previous tow-point calibration and correction method was used for comparison. The experimental results show that during the temperature range of 25-65 ℃, compared with the original calibration precision, the three-point calibration technology owns quite an effective consequence with the biggest absolute error of 0.126 6 K and average error of -0.048 8 K. However, the method proposed does not have quite abvious difference with the tow-point method, so generally the tow-point calibration and correction can adapt the normal radiometric calibration application.

Reference (21)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return