范有臣, 马旭, 马淑丽, 钱克昌, 郝红星. 基于深度学习的激光干扰效果评价方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(S2): 20210323. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210323
引用本文: 范有臣, 马旭, 马淑丽, 钱克昌, 郝红星. 基于深度学习的激光干扰效果评价方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(S2): 20210323. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210323
Fan Youchen, Ma Xu, Ma Shuli, Qian Kechang, Hao Hongxing. Evaluation method of laser jamming effect based on deep learning[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(S2): 20210323. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210323
Citation: Fan Youchen, Ma Xu, Ma Shuli, Qian Kechang, Hao Hongxing. Evaluation method of laser jamming effect based on deep learning[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(S2): 20210323. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210323

基于深度学习的激光干扰效果评价方法

Evaluation method of laser jamming effect based on deep learning

  • 摘要: 针对激光干扰效果评估受主观经验较大、难以定量评估的问题,提出了一种基于深度学习的激光干扰效果评估方法。首先,对YOLOV5算法进行了整体介绍,其次制作了来自不同角度、不同距离的3 020张激光干扰图像;然后,对标注的数据集进行训练,得到了激光干扰效果评估模型;最后,分别在YOLOV5x、YOLOV5l、YOLOV5m、YOLOV5s网络模型下训练300次,实验验证了模型的正确性。实验结果表明:利用训练好的模型实现了对激光干扰图像的效果评估,该模型不仅可以自动标注激光干扰区域和进行干扰效果等级评估,同时还融入了传统策略,可以通过计算标注区域面积占整幅图像面积的大小作为辅助决策,实现自动标注激光干扰区域面积所占百分比,识别准确度在80%以上,对激光干扰效果评估具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: Aiming at the problem that the evaluation of laser jamming effect is influenced by subjective experience and difficult to evaluate quantitatively, a laser jamming effect evaluation method based on deep learning was proposed. Firstly, the overall introduction of the YOLOV5 algorithm was given. Secondly, 3 020 laser jamming image from different angles and distances were produced. Then, the labeled data sets were trained to obtain the laser jamming effect evaluation model. Finally, the model was trained 300 times under the network models of YOLOV5x, YOLOV5l, YOLOV5m and YOLOV5s respectively. The experimental results show that the trained model can be used to evaluate the effect of laser interference image. The model could not only automatically label the laser interference area and evaluate the interference effect level, but also integrate the traditional strategy. It could calculate the area of the labeled area in the whole image as an auxiliary decision. The percentage of laser jamming area was automatically marked. The recognition accuracy was more than 80%, which is of great significance to the evaluation of laser jamming effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回