任成明, 孟庆宇, 秦子长. 大型自由曲面离轴三反光学系统降敏设计(特邀)[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(7): 20230287. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230287
引用本文: 任成明, 孟庆宇, 秦子长. 大型自由曲面离轴三反光学系统降敏设计(特邀)[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(7): 20230287. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230287
Ren Chengming, Meng Qingyu, Qin Zichang. Desensitization design of large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system (invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(7): 20230287. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230287
Citation: Ren Chengming, Meng Qingyu, Qin Zichang. Desensitization design of large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system (invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(7): 20230287. DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230287

大型自由曲面离轴三反光学系统降敏设计(特邀)

Desensitization design of large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system (invited)

  • 摘要: 离轴三反光学系统基于无孔径遮拦、可实现大视场等优势,结合自由度高、像差校正能力强的光学自由曲面,可以实现优异的光学性能。光学系统成像指标的不断提高促使反射式光学系统的口径和焦距不断增大,光学系统误差敏感度剧增,加工难度和装调敏感度也随之提高,耗费的时间和经济成本巨大。误差敏感度可以表征光学系统在失调后的敏感程度,误差敏感度低的光学系统公差精度要求宽松,在优化过程中控制误差敏感度可以实现像质与成本之间的最佳平衡。因此,降敏优化是光学系统设计过程中不可或缺的一环。文中提出的角度优化降敏设计方法和局部曲率控制降敏设计方法对一个焦距30 000 mm、F数为15、视场角1°×1°的大型自由曲面离轴三反光学系统进行了降敏设计并进行对比,结果表明,在光学系统构型无显著差异的情况下,使用两种降敏设计方法降敏后的光学系统像差校正理论结果均表现优异,调制传递函数(MTF)均接近衍射极限,两种降敏设计方法均可以有效降低光学系统误差敏感度。对比发现,局部曲率控制降敏设计方法降敏效果更好。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   Off-axis three-mirror optical systems, based on the advantages of non-obscuration and capable of achieving a large field of view (FOV), can exhibit excellent optical performance, combined with the optical freeform surface with high degrees of freedom and strong aberration correction ability. The improvement of the imaging requirements has led to the continuous increase of the aperture and focal length of the reflective optical system, the error sensitivity of the optical system increases dramatically, resulting in higher processing difficulty and alignment sensitivity, as well as substantial time and economic costs. Error sensitivity represents the sensitivity of optical system after misalignment. The tolerance accuracy of optical system with low error sensitivity is loose. By controlling error sensitivity during the optimization process, an optimal balance can be achieved between image quality and cost. Therefore, desensitization optimization is an indispensable part of the large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system design process.
      Methods   Low error sensitivity optical system design begins with the selection of image quality evaluation criteria that can characterize the error sensitivity. The optical path difference and wavefront error are selected as two image quality evaluation criteria, and the geometrical optics method is adopted to establish the mathematical model of ray tracing before and after misalignment (Fig.1, Fig.4). Then the mathematical relationship between the parameters of the optical system and the error sensitivity is obtained, two error sensitivity evaluation functions (S and LC) are constructed based on the mathematical relationship, and the angle optimization desensitization design method and the local curvature desensitization design method are proposed as two desensitization design methods applicable to freeform optical systems according to the evaluation functions. A desensitization design process for large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical systems is developed (Fig.5). Two proposed desensitization design methods are applied to desensitize a large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system with a focal length of 30 000 mm, an F number of 15 and an FOV of 1°×1° (Tab.1), and the desensitization effect of the two methods is compared.
      Results and Discussions  The initial structure of the large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system is System 1 (Fig.7), the angle optimization desensitization design method is used to obtain System 2, and the local curvature control desensitization design method is used to obtain System 3. The modulation transfer function (MTF) of all three systems is close to the diffraction limit, and the average RMS WFE of System 1, System 2, and System 3 is 0.038λ, 0.036λ and 0.039λ respectively (Fig.8), the image quality of all three systems is in the range of 0.038× (1±5%)λ and less than 1/15λ of each FOV (Fig.8).The total length of System 1, System 2, and System 3 is9 097.23 mm, 8 862.07 mm and 9 100.00 mm (Tab.2) respectively. The three systems are identical in configuration and differ slightly in total length. Under the tilt error perturbation (tangential: 0.001°, sagittal: 0.001°), the error sensitivity (ΔRMS WFE) of System 1, System 2, and System 3 is 0.089λ, 0.073λ and 0.062λ respectively (Fig.9). The error sensitivity is reduced by 17.98% using the angle optimization desensitization design method and by 30.34% using the local curvature control desensitization design method, obviously the latter method has better desensitization effect.
      Conclusions   In this paper, the angle optimization desensitization design method and the local curvature control desensitization design method are introduced to desensitize the large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system. Systems designed with different methods are compared, and the results demonstrate that, under the condition of no significant differences in optical system configuration, both desensitization design methods exhibit excellent theoretical aberration correction results for the optical system, and the MTF of the systems is close to the diffraction limit. The two desensitization design methods can effectively reduce the error sensitivity of the optical system, and it is found that the local curvature control desensitization design method can achieve better desensitization performance. Applying the desensitization design method in the large freeform off-axis three-mirror optical system design process correctly can significantly improve the system robustness, and effectively reduce the manufacturing cost, which is of great significance for the design and construction of large optical systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回