-
基于直接生长方法制备的三明治型纳米激光器阵列加工流程如图1所示。在前期制备好的高品质因子(Q值)的悬空Si3N4微盘上通过物理气相沉积(Physical Vapor Deposition, PVD)的方法生长单层硫化钨(WS2),作为纳米激光器中的增益材料;为了保证单层WS2能在激光泵浦条件下稳定工作,同时为了保证单层增益材料中更大的光学限制因子,在单层WS2生长完成后,借助原子层沉积(Atomic Layer Deposition, ALD)的方法在WS2层上沉积一定厚度的氧化铝(Al2O3),制备出Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3三明治型纳米激光器阵列。
-
对于该Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3三明治型纳米激光器,光学限制因子$\varGamma $可以表示为:
$$ \varGamma {\text{ = }}\left( {{{\int_{{\rm{W}}{{\rm{S}}_2}} {{\varepsilon _{{\rm{W}}{{\rm{S}}_2}}}\left| {{E_\parallel }} \right|} }^2}{\rm{d}}V} \right)\bigg/\left( {{{\int_V {\varepsilon \left| E \right|} }^2}{\rm{d}}V} \right) $$ (1) 式中:$ \varepsilon $为介电常数;E为电场强度。
光学限制因子可以理解为局域在有源层中的能量(单层WS2)与器件中整体能量的比值。公式(1)中的dV表示对体积的积分,其中单层WS2的厚度为0.65 nm。
-
不同于传统的二维材料转移方式,利用这种直接生长的方式,可以在Si3N4微盘的上表面、边缘和下表面都生长单层的增益材料,如图2(a)所示。由于Si3N4微盘下方的氧化硅(SiO2)支柱不会对位于微盘边缘的回音壁模式(Whispering Gallery Modes,WGMs)产生影响,所以在构建仿真模型时省去了SiO2支柱结构。其次,在构建的如图2(b)所示的简化模型中,也省略了因SiO2支柱导致的WS2的圆形缺口。由于仿真模型中有源区的体积要略大于实际器件中的有源区体积,仿真计算所得的光学限制因子也会略大于实际器件中的数值。但是微盘腔的WGMs主要分布在微盘边缘,因此这种简化处理不会对最终的结论产生影响,被WS2完全包裹的微盘与底部有WS2缺口的微盘,其性能基本不会有差别。
前期的实验中,在Al2O3覆盖层厚度为130 nm、Si3N4微盘直径为300 nm、Si3N4微盘厚度为300 nm的三明治型纳米激光器中观察到了室温激射行为。基于以上实验中的初步结果,文中将进一步分析Al2O3覆盖层的厚度T、Si3N4微盘直径D以及厚度H对光学限制因子的影响,为后期器件参数的优化提供指导。
Optimization of structural parameters of Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3 sandwich nanolaser
-
摘要: 高性能的片上纳米激光器对通信、传感以及量子等领域的发展有着至关重要的意义。纳米激光器中高的光学限制因子可以保证更大的模式增益,实现更低的激光器阈值。首先阐明了借助物理气相沉积和原子层沉积制备Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3三明治型纳米激光器阵列的工艺流程;构建了该纳米激光器的仿真模型,在仿真模型中对实际结构进行了简化并分析了Al2O3覆盖层厚度T、Si3N4微盘直径D和厚度H对光学限制因子的影响。光学限制因子随着Al2O3覆盖层T以及Si3N4微盘直径D的增加有先增加后减小的趋势,Si3N4微盘厚度H的减小也可以显著增加激光器的光学限制因子;最后展示了器件的荧光以及扫描电子显微镜的表征结果。该工作为集成光学芯片中可规模制备的高性能纳米激光器打下了良好基础。Abstract:
Objective High-performance on-chip nanolasers are very important for the development of communication, sensing, quantum and so on. On-chip nanolasers can be realized by integrating layered two-dimensional (2D) transition metal chalcogenides (TMDs) with optical microcavities. However, the integration of traditional 2D materials and microcavities is achieved by transfer methods, which limits the scale fabrication of on-chip nanolasers. Based on the above background, we propose a prototype of a TMDs-based microcavity nanolaser array prepared by direct growth method. High optical confinement factor in nanolasers can ensure a larger mode gain and a lower laser threshold. It is necessary to analyze the influence of various geometric parameters on the optical confinement factor of nanolaser by simulation and to optimize the structure, so as to lay a certain theoretical foundation for high-performance nanolasers that can be prepared on a large scale in integrated optical chips. Methods Suspended silicon nitride (Si3N4) microdisk resonators with high quality factor were prepared using complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible fabrication process; Different from traditional transfer methods to realize the integration of 2D material and microcavity, we propose to use physical vapor deposition (PVD) method to directly grow monolayer tungsten sulfide (WS2) on the surface of Si3N4 microdisk as gain material, realizing the conformal covering of the microdisk; In order to ensure that monolayer WS2 can work stably under the pump of a laser, and to ensure a larger confinement factor in the monolayer gain material, the method of atomic layer deposition (ALD) was used to deposit alumina (Al2O3) with a certain thickness, and a nanolaser with sandwich structure Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3 was formed; A simplified 3D simulation model of the nanolaser was constructed in Comsol software, and the effects of Al2O3 coating thickness T, Si3N4 microdisk diameter D and thickness H on the optical confinement factor were analyzed; The devices were characterized by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. Results and Discussions When constructing the simulation model, the silicon oxide (SiO2) pillar structure and the circular notch of monolayer WS2 caused by the SiO2 pillar are omitted (Fig.2); The effects of Al2O3 coating thickness T (Fig.4), Si3N4 microdisk diameter D (Fig.6) and thickness H (Fig.7) on the optical confinement factor were analyzed. Within the range of selected parameters, the optical confinement factor first increases and then decreases with the increase of Al2O3 coating thickness T and Si3N4 microdisk diameter D, the decrease of the thickness H of the Si3N4 microdisk can also significantly increase the optical confinement factor of the nanolaser; The feasibility of this direct growth method was demonstrated by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy after monolayer WS2 was grown onto the Si3N4 microdisk (Fig.8); After the deposition of completion of Al2O3, time-space images of the nanolaser above and below the threshold were shown (Fig.9). Conclusions Nanolaser with a sandwich structure Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3 was proposed. The preparation process of the sandwich nanolaser was expounded. Suspended Si3N4 microdisk resonators with high quality factor were prepared using CMOS-compatible fabrication process, PVD method was used to directly grow monolayer WS2 on the surface of Si3N4 microdisk as gain material, and ALD method was adopted to deposit Al2O3 with a certain thickness after monolayer WS2 was grown. Thus, the nanolaser with a sandwich structure Si3N4/WS2/Al2O3 was formed; In the simulation software, the geometry of the nanolaser was simplified and the parameters were simulated and optimized, the effects of Al2O3 coating thickness T, Si3N4 microdisk diameter D and thickness H on the optical confinement factor were analyzed. Within the range of selected parameters, the optical confinement factor first increases and then decreases with the increase of Al2O3 coating thickness T and Si3N4 microdisk diameter D, the decrease of the thickness H of the Si3N4 microdisk can also significantly increase the optical confinement factor of the nanolaser; The characterization results of some devices were displayed, which lays a good simulation foundation for the further optimization of device parameters in the later period, and has certain guiding significance for the large-scale preparation of high-performance nanolasers in the field of optical communication and so on. -
图 8 借助PVD方法在Si3N4微盘上生长层状WS2后器件的表征结果。(a)~(b) 器件的PL图像;(c) 在微盘阵列和 (d) 单个微盘上生长WS2后的SEM表征结果
Figure 8. Characterization results of devices after layered WS2 was grown onto Si3N4 microdisks by the PVD method. (a)-(b) PL images of the device; SEM characterization results of WS2 grown onto (c) microdisk array and (d) a single microdisk
-
[1] Ning Cunzheng. Semiconductor nanolasers and the size-energy-efficiency challenge: a review [J]. Advanced Photonics, 2019, 1(1): 014002. doi: 10.1117/1.AP.1.1.014002 [2] Atabaki A H, Moazeni S, Pavanello F, et al. Integrating photonics with silicon nanoelectronics for the next generation of systems on a chip [J]. Nature, 2018, 556(7701): 349-354. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0028-z [3] Cheng Q, Bahadori M, Glick M, et al. Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: a review [J]. Optica, 2018, 5(11): 1354-1370. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.5.001354 [4] Xia F, Wang H, Xiao D, et al. Two-dimensional material nanophotonics [J]. Nature Photonics, 2014, 8(12): 899-907. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.271 [5] Wang L, Zhou X, Yang S, et al. 2D-material-integrated whispering-gallery-mode microcavity [J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(8): 905-916. doi: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000905 [6] Du W, Li C, Sun, J, et al. Nanolasers based on 2D materials [J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2020, 14(12): 2000271. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000271 [7] Li Y, Sun H, Gan L, et al. Optical properties and light-emission device applications of 2D layered semiconductors [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2020, 108(5): 676-703. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2936424 [8] You J, Luo Y, Yang J, et al. Hybrid/Integrated silicon photonics based on 2D materials in optical communication nanosystems [J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2020, 14(12): 2000239. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000239 [9] Liu D S, Wu J, Xu H, et al. Emerging light-emitting materials for photonic integration [J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(4): 2003733. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003733 [10] Reed J C, Zhu A Y, Zhu H, et al. Wavelength tunable microdisk cavity light source with a chemically enhanced MoS2 emitter [J]. Nano Letters, 2015, 15(3): 1967-1971. doi: 10.1021/nl5048303 [11] Wu S, Buckley S, Schaibley J R, et al. Monolayer semiconductor nanocavity lasers with ultralow thresholds [J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7545): 69-72. doi: 10.1038/nature14290 [12] Ye Y, Wong Z J, Lu X, et al. Monolayer excitonic laser [J]. Nature Photonics, 2015, 9(11): 733-737. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.197 [13] Li Y, Zhang J, Huang D, et al. Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing from monolayer molybdenum ditelluride integrated with a silicon nanobeam cavity [J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2017, 12(10): 987-992. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.128 [14] Fang H, Liu J, Li H, et al. 1 305 nm few-layer MoTe2-on-silicon laser-like emission [J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2018, 12(6): 1800015. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201800015 [15] Liu Y, Fang H, Rasmita A, et al. Room temperature nanocavity laser with interlayer excitons in 2D heterostructures [J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(4): eaav4506. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4506 [16] Liu N, Yang X, Zhang J, et al. Room-temperature excitonic nanolaser array with directly grown monolayer WS2 [J]. ACS Photonics, 2023, 10(1): 283-289. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01618